Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Leiser


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Eric Leiser

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not appear to be notable. Coverage in third-party sources is not significant. Has not won any awards or such like. Martin 14:04, 16 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Foxy Loxy  Pounce! 23:42, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep: OK, the entry is weak but it does have potential. There is considerable achievement but it is very weak on independent references. I feel that this can be corrected. Far too much space is given to sports and actor personalities and far to little to the guy behind the scenes. I suggest 1. more independent references, 2. better direction and 3. a general attempt to find one hook or reason for notability. Royalhistorian (talk) 04:53, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:50, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:50, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:50, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and send to cleanup. A number of the article's current EL's have potential to further source the article.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The director/animator of two films with articles surely meets WP:CREATIVE? Actually, looking there it seems as if an actor in multiple notable films is covered (byWP:ENTERTAINER), but the director may not be - that anomaly should surely be adjusted? Keep anyway. Johnbod (talk) 15:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep 3 Internationally distributed film releases, worldwide film festival coverage and international theatrical distribution = notibility. Also, 2 more art shows added (another in Los Angeles, and New York) take the art gallery tally to 6. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.188.242.84 (talk) 11:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources found, establishing notability. — Erik (talk • contrib) 15:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.