Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Stetson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 09:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Eric Stetson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article is non-notable. All but one sources on the page are self-published sources from organizations that the subject has created. A google search also links to those same self-created organizations. Jeff3000 (talk) 02:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Subject of the article is the co-founder of a religious denomination with a presence in 16 states. He has also authored two books. A35821361 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * That doesn't make him notable in the context of Wikipedia. Anyone can author any number of books.  Notability is based on the number of non-self-published reliable sources.  -- 01:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as nothing particularly convincing for any solid independent notability, nothing else to therefore suggest salvageability and keeping. SwisterTwister   talk  01:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see convincing evidence of action beyond a single church community and the "recent comments" on their meetings are 2013 and "recent posts" are from 2015 even for that one. One page lists two churches as members of the association. The books don't count.--Smkolins (talk) 01:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. No sign of significant coverage in reliable sources. B E C K Y S A Y L E S  07:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.