Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Striker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. (Nomination withdrawn) (non-admin closure)   ƬheStrike  Σagle   06:07, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Eric Striker

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NCOLLATH. WP:TOOSOON John from Idegon (talk) 01:19, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:TOOSOON —Мандичка YO 😜 01:31, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  01:33, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete this particular reference is not enough to make this guy notable. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 13:09, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep There's plenty of coverage out there they just need to be added to the article: just to name a few. Add in the fact he is one of the best LB's in college football, this is a clear keep.--Yankees10 20:03, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep He's received plenty of national individual coverage Kobra98 (talk) 04:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep While much of what Yankees10 lists I would consider WP:ROUTINE, the SI and ESPN articles are not. In addition, I came across these [], [], and [].  To me, that is enough to show GNG is met and therefore keep.RonSigPi (talk) 23:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * WITHDRAWN NOMINATION and request CLOSE- SPEEDY KEEP. per above, obviously meets GNG. John from Idegon (talk) 00:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as a WP:GNG pass, per Yankees10. Ejgreen77 (talk) 13:22, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.