Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Windeler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  08:22, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Eric Windeler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

claims of notability, but no actual evidence.  DGG ( talk ) 19:46, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


 * There are links and ciatations included in the article and all facts are stated in editors own words. Sentence is question is a statement and is not framed to be plagiarized. Anyone could have used the sentence in the same way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TiffaniL (talk • contribs) 16:10, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't understand why you're lapsing into plagiarism-related arguments, which have nothing to do with anything since nobody accused anybody of that. Bearcat (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:53, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:26, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is based far too strongly on primary sources rather than reliable ones (e.g. his own LinkedIn, his own "our president" profile on the website of his own organization, etc.), and the few acceptably reliable sources aren't about him but merely feature him giving soundbite about the concept that is the subject of those articles. Nothing claimed in the article is an automatic notability freebie that exempts him from having to be the subject of enough media coverage about him to clear WP:GNG, but this article as written and sourced presents virtually no evidence that he is. Bearcat (talk) 15:57, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- wholly unremarkable. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn nor a fundraising venue. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:46, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, and somewhat promotional. DaveApter (talk) 15:20, 5 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.