Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric eman adger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete - nn-bio. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Eric eman adger

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Okay was not sure if to put this a prod or a AFD but went witha AFD. This seems to be a over long bio Wgolf (talk) 03:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment-I didn't even notice until AFTER I put up the AFD-but the name of the person who started this. Wgolf (talk) 03:26, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I did a search and I can't really find anything that mentions him by name. The only thing he's ever really been semi-frequently cited for was his guest appearance on the Royal Highness album and even then, he's never really highlighted as an artist: it's always as part of a database entry on the album as a whole. The only person who really seems to be talking about Adger is Adger himself, as there isn't an overly huge amount of fan chatter for him. As far as his association with notable persons goes, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. It only makes it more likely that someone would gain coverage, but it's never a guarantee and Adger's contributions to various albums and whatnot isn't enough to where it gained him enough (or really any) coverage to where he'd pass WP:ARTIST. It also doesn't help that this entire article is written in a very, very promotional style and could likely be speedied as spam. I'd say that we should let it run through a full AfD just in case there are other sources (doubtful) and so if it gets re-created before these issues are dealt with, we can always G4 it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:53, 8 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment-Yeah I think this might of been better then the prod as sometimes they find a way to sneak around it. Wgolf (talk) 04:55, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:41, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. A7, no sources, autobio, questionable accomplishments. What else do you need? So tagged. -- Alexf(talk) 09:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.