Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erica Iverson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Erica Iverson

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject fails WP:GNG. Could not find reliable, secondary source significant coverage. Only source cited on article that offers this is a primary source from UMass. Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football,  and United States of America. Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 18:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Has multiple third person sources to demonstrate notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 00:37, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources in the article are not covering her directly and in depth. #1 is stats ❌. #2 is non-independent ❌. #3 is a hyper-local interview of her and her husband and covers them as a couple, not her specifically in detail ❌. #4 is non-independent ❌. #5 is hyper-local news with <1 sentence of passing mentions of her ❌. #6 is a contributed piece (so of unclear independence or editorial status) published in the same outlet as #3 and containing little more than quotes from her/her husband ❌. JoelleJay (talk) 05:04, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP Football Notability by playing for a fully professional team in a nation league. Better sourcing would enhance the article. Demt1298 (talk) 20:58, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @Demt1298, NFOOTY was deprecated last year and does not carry any weight. JoelleJay (talk) 00:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @JoelleJay Is there a discussion I can read on this? Demt1298 (talk) 01:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Click on the WP Football Notability, then go back a level to Project Football and scroll down to notability; that essay has been replaced with GNG. Here's the link . Oaktree b (talk) 02:24, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Or just go to WP:NSPORT. NFOOTY is no longer listed there (and never superseded lack of GNG coverage even when it was). JoelleJay (talk) 02:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: This subject does not meet any notability guidelines, merely being mentioned in match reports which do not meet WP:SIGCOV. WP Football Player Notability is an essay, and is not a substitute for the subject lacking third party sources. The keep votes have so far not provided any sources to show notability. User:Let'srun 23:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.