Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erich Kästner Museum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 13:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Erich Kästner Museum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reads like an advertisement of the museum. Unsourced content. Needs major work to remain as a sustainable article. TRL (talk) 15:11, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Keep looks like someone saw this on deWiki and esWiki where the article is since 2007 and thought we should have it as well. With the name of Erich Kästner behind it there must be sourcing somewhere especially as this is his "home museum" and an example of the concept of a micro-museum. Anyway while a quick google-search did not show much of the usual bla-bla I found this gem on scholar.google.com: Maria Brückner, 2009, Eine Analyse der literaturmusealen Konzeption des Erich Kästner Museums, München, GRIN Verlag GmbH, http://www.grin.com/de/e-book/156382/eine-analyse-der-literaturmusealen-konzeption-des-erich-kaestner-museums . Cleanup obviously required. Agathoclea (talk) 20:15, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've started adding what I can find; there must be newspaper coverage somewhere but Google is not cooperating. Unfortunately the Brückner source is publish-on-demand and is just a seminar paper, but I'll see if it leads me to any sources. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:26, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep but work on the issues, as begun by Yngvadottir, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:34, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Yngvadottir has improved it enough that it passes notability guidelines and it can continue to be worked on/improved. Since when is "needs major work" a reason for AFD? StarM 02:50, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Thanks for the confidence in me expressed above, but what puts it over the top for me is that the page creator has come up with a reference for an award. Yngvadottir (talk) 23:02, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.