Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erickson's Law

Erickson's Law was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

- Neologism, like Gerdwin's Law and a host of others we've deleted in the last month or so. 29 hits on google, including this article and mirrors, and unrelated articles. --Tagishsimon
 * Delete. Neologism. jni 11:04, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 02:48, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: If we keep it, the terrorists have won and forced us to catalog platitudes as encyclopedic content. Geogre 13:23, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism, no evident of widespread use presented. Creating neologisms was a typical Nazi tactic. If we oppose it, God wins. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 20:15, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.