Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ericsson T66


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep per consensus.(closed by non-admin) RMHED 19:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Ericsson T66

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable commercial product. Insufficient third-party resources exist to reference a sustainable wikipedia article. prod removed with the argument that the phone's size and weight make it notable. I don't see these criteria at WP:N. WP is not an Ericsson catalog. Mikeblas (talk) 17:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. A quick search for "mobile phone notability" brought a number of AfD rulings on similar cases and they have all kinds of outcomes and arguments. Here's a few AfDs: Nokia 1100, Motorola C261, Nokia 6151, Motorola C139, LG CU500. I feel that a centralized discussion is in order to establish notability guidelines for cell phones. --Yury Petrachenko (talk) 18:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - I find a large amount of information on this phone when I look around. This article needs some editors to improve it in order to bring it up to standards. Still notable. -- ZeWrestler   Talk 17:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep—appear to be sufficient references available. Spacepotato 19:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep but needs some improvement --EJF 19:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.