Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erie Life Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. There also seems to be a consensus to merge Erie Life Magazine into Great Lakes Life Magazine Mark Arsten (talk) 00:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Erie Life Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable magazine, possibly even self-promotional. Doesn't appear to even exist anymore. Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 03:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Also being is nominated is the following for the same reason as it is closely associated with the first article:
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:07, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:07, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:07, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:07, 14 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge Erie into Great Lakes. Keep Great Lakes. Magazines are notoriously difficult to find sourcing so any sourcing is a sign of notability. For Great Lakes we have and, both published in Folio magazine which is a national "that serves the entire magazine publishing industry". Erie is part of the history of Great Lakes, a merger or name change. These sources have enough information to write an article with. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - Great Lakes Life and merge Erie Life into it. The sources provided above by User:Green Cardamom denote that Great Lakes Life meets GNG, and I agree with the merge suggestion. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, per above research into source coverage. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article needs sources, which have been found.Crtew (talk) 19:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.