Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Estavillo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete g11 self-promotion, and arguable g7 author request per one of author's (now-deleted) comments in this AFD. Note that author is now blocked for legal threats. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Erik Estavillo

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Poorly sourced, seems to be nothing but COI and coatrack. He was involved in a couple lawsuits, that's about it. Possible BLP violation since it's more about the lawsuits than the man. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:11, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete. I think some editors think if they overwhelm us with tons of copy, we won't catch on. But I nominate for deletion definitely because of the coatracking. (I just didn't know how to describe it before; thanks, Hammer10 lb.!) Most sourcing is likely from the creator's own website. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:16, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable person; self-advertising, with not much substance behind the noise. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:56, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Actually, my "very informed" friends, the man behind the law@gaming name is me, Erik Estavillo himself. Now, a lot of you are voting for deletion. But before you do, I have to ask, "How many of you wikipedia editors can honestly google your name and get any results like I do?" If anything is a coatrack, it's the fact you all make assumptions about the editor while you yourselves couldn't improve an article significantly if you tried. By the way, I vote for deletion, haha. I'll always be remembered for what I did while you won't. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.195.210.152 (talk) 18:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Google results do not a Wikipedia article make. Jus' sayin'. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:16, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, self-promotion by nonnotable person. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:18, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I just googled you NawlinWiki, your real name too. Talk about non-notable. Good day sir. (the article creator).
 * Um, no, "NawlinWiki" is not my real name, oddly enough. And yep, I'm nonnotable -- that's why there's no Wikipedia article about me.  Same should apply to you.  Also, please read Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.