Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Figueroa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Erik Figueroa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was that he is not prove[n] to have played in a fully professional league. Since Superettan does not appear at WP:FPL, the article fails WP:NSPORT. The PROD was contested on the grounds that he may meet WP:GNG based on routine transfer speculation, which does not amount to significant coverage. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:18, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG as has not played in a fully professional league nor played senior intenrational football, nor appeared to have garnered significant, reliable coverage for any other achievements. Fenix down (talk) 10:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 13:32, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - as proposed in the PROD. Fails WP:NFOOTY. I can't see how he fullfills the GNG criterias, so delete.Grrahnbahr (talk) 23:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree with everything said above... article doesn't meet WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG. Definitley not enough for even a weak delete, we would need many more sources to be able to keep it! SayItRight1 (talk) 20:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete This article does not have dependable references and this particular person does not warrant an article.Whitescorp34 (talk) 02:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.