Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Huggers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Vaticidalprophet (talk) 08:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Erik Huggers

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:RESUME on Wikipedia. Coverage is routine business announcements about companies he's managed and the usual announcements of managerial comings and goings. His impact on the BBC would be better covered at BBC, though the material currently present in the article is not neutral. Biography notability cleanup tag present for nearly 3 years. FalconK (talk) 01:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 01:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 01:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 01:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete an overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:59, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep According to the Guardian: "Erik Huggers has overseen nothing short of a revolution in the way we watch television." Piecesofuk (talk) 19:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * This one source comes close to meeting the significant, independent, and reliable bar, even though it is a profile, but a single instance of reliable coverage rarely suffices. Also, it's about his work with the BBC, and if that's the only thing we will remember him for, any actual information about what he did would be better merged over there.  The sentence you quote is a statement of opinion, not of fact.  FalconK (talk) 02:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep He has significant coverage, BBC, Forbes, Billboard, Variety, The Guardian, most of these are in depth too. This meets WP:GNG. I think if anyone thinks this doesn't qualify then they should not be voting here or editing Wikipedia. Expertwikiguy (talk) 04:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - former CEO of Vevo, and has has plenty of coverage. It's not so bad as to require an entire re-write. Bearian (talk) 00:30, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep; He has significant coverage. Article is a bit like machine-gun coverage, he did this, he did that, he spent £639 on taxi fares in one day, blah, blah. Coverage is sufficiently significant. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.