Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Kloeker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Erik Kloeker

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Completing nomination on behalf of User:216.196.139.146 Rationale from talk page is: "I just came across this today and it appears to have quite a few notability issues and the article itself has been entirely edited by Erik Kloeker (Users User:Erikkloeker and User:Edit_tore_n_chief)." RoninBK T C 13:32, 17 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *poke* 20:32, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The only notable thing appears to be the Guinness world record, in itself I don't think holders of such records are automatically wiki notable, so unless someone points me to some guideline that says they are, I support deletion, as not passing the WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Off2riorob (talk) 13:44, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * In this case, the Guinness book can likely be treated as a reliable source supporting notability, their criteria for bestowing an award is significantly strict. That being said, in most cases multiple sources are expected before the GNG can be considered satisfied. -- RoninBK T C 19:19, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, not reliably sourced, autobiography..Jonathanwallace (talk) 15:32, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, lack of independent reports. Off2riorob (talk) 20:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.