Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Rush


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was KEEP. Hu12 22:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Erik Rush

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Was PRODded "doesn't appear notable, no independent sources". A day later the PROD was replaced with an AfD template with an edit-summary "article has been around for 2 years. deserves debate". I'm just completing the nom here, I abstain. DMacks 05:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. A Google search actually shows a large number of hits for different essays by this guy, and he appears to get at least a little play in the mainstream media.  However, I'm not sure if that's enough for notability. SkipSmith 07:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The guy certainly has a large buzz on the conversative blogosphere, although it seems that 99% of it is in response to his attacks on Barack Obama.  Certainly enough for the "cult following" criterion of WP:BIO.  RGTraynor 16:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.