Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Wikholm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. WP:CSD, no assertion of notability. JohnCD (talk) 12:29, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Erik Wikholm

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

No sources to support claim of notability. Web search yields only self-published stuff, and news search nothing at all. Speedy deletion tag was removed by one-minute-old account. Favonian (talk) 00:11, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Two hits for the year 2006 and one hit this year listed in Google News. Fails WP:N.  -Pickbothmanlol-   00:23, 6 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Arguably a speedy delete candidate. I don't see how working for a notable company is in itself a claim to notability. The A7 tag was removed by an obvious sock of the creator, their only posts so far are in this entry and a cranky user page edit; I've replaced the tag. Hairhorn (talk) 01:54, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 01:57, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.