Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika Kitagawa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 10:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Erika Kitagawa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Inadequately sourced BLP. Even if the award passed pornbio - which is unlikely given its reputed to be an inhouse award - this is laughably poorly sourced and the GNG trumps SNGs. Spartaz Humbug! 16:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. No non-trivial reliable source coverage and only a minor award win. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:PORNBIO. Only RS coverage found in independent searching is a cast listing in video game zine. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete total lack of sources to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Entirely bereft of independent reliable sourcing, no actual claim of notability. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 18:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient indicia of notability. Montanabw (talk) 08:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable adult film actress. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   12:25, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.