Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erin Finn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Kurykh  01:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Erin Finn

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Got a smidge of media coverage for supposedly being one of the many victims of Anthony Pellicano. However, all the coverage that she received is one from one event. There's also wp:blp concerns.  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 14:16, 25 June 2008 (UTC) There's more to her story. I've heard of her and recall she did something with TechTV, Kevin Mitnick and some Linux thing. Frankly, any hot girl that's into Linux has my vote. I'll dig around also and see what I can find. Lexlex (talk) 16:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral for now I'll change this later one way or the other, but the article at least claims she's notable for multiple things - the wiretap and her businesses (don't think the Salon column establishes notability to the latter, but I'll dig more). Townlake (talk) 14:54, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Found nothing more than trivial coverage of her businesses. I didn't understand the BLP concerns on first read, but now that I've done my digging, I think the concerns are valid. Townlake (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:33, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I suppose it could be improved but as of now the article fails to demonstrate any real notability. Her website isn't particularly notable and her own alleged harassment by a prominent investigator does not transfer his notability to her. --Dhartung | Talk 22:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete It's not alledged harassment, she really was harassed - thus the reason she was a Federal Witness... However, I also see nothing of note here other than that.Lexlex (talk) 00:48, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.