Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erin umberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:42, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Erin umberg

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Contested prod. Biography of a young scientist who is starting her career but is nowhere close to meeting the basic requirements for biographical articles or the ones specific to academics. Pichpich (talk) 20:01, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Don't DeleteGiven her family background and young career and military ranking, I would consider this a valid addition to wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.195.194.62 (talk) 20:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC) — 128.195.194.62 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. . Xxanthippe (talk) 02:05, 3 July 2012 (UTC).
 * Unless that military background or family background has resulted in in-depth coverage of Erin Umberg in reliable third-party sources then this article cannot stay on Wikipedia. As far as I can tell, the only existing coverage is related to a harassment charge with absolutely no encyclopedic interest. Pichpich (talk) 20:34, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable yet per WP:BIO. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:44, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. A total of 2 cites on Google Scholar. No possibility of passing WP:Prof or WP:GNG. Far, far, far too early. Negligible sources. Author of article seems to be confusing Wikipedia with Facebook. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:05, 3 July 2012 (UTC).
 * Delete. No doubt a worthy individual, but fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF. -- 202.124.75.150 (talk) 02:40, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Good luck Erin; when you're a prof with more articles etc., hope to see you again. Till then, see the WP:PROF guidelines for why we've deleted.  -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 14:43, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete Erin Umberg is a professor. Her background is of interst to a wide group of people. In addtion, she is part of a well known politcal/miltary family - particularly in California. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.241.135.78 (talk) 19:20, 3 July 2012 (UTC) — 63.241.135.78 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC).


 * Don't DeleteSeems reasonable given that both of her parents are prominent political figures in California, so would be of general interest to many. That, in addition to her authorships and professor position.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.87.11.116 (talk) 17:23, 4 July 2012 (UTC) — 76.87.11.116 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment. Several anon spas are arguing for keep on the basis that the subject comes from a family background prominent in political and military affairs. The subject's father appears to be Tom Umberg, a minor politician and former Guantanamo prosecutor. There is a complaint on his talk page that unfavorable material has been removed from it by spas. Be this as it may, notability is not inherited. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:22, 5 July 2012 (UTC).
 * Delete. All WP:OR, no WP:RS, and no obvious pass of any of the standard notability guidelines. Agricola44 (talk) 14:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC).
 * Delete as per Michael Scott Cuthbert and Agricola44. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not meet WP:SCHOLAR, WP:ANYBIO, or WP:GNG. Her parents may be notable, but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED --Joshuaism (talk) 20:53, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.