Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eriogonum heracleoides


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 22:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Eriogonum heracleoides

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Very poorly written article about a semi-notable topic. gordonrox24 (talk) 22:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. There are individual articles on most Eriogonum species, and this one doesn't appear significantly less notable than the rest. Tevildo (talk) 22:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - It is the intention of the various biological projects that there will be at least a stub article on all scientifically recognised species with links to Wikispecies. I've done an initial cleanup by going to just one reference book - don't have time for more at the moment. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 23:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - all plants, especially ones with common names like parsnipflower, are per se notable. If you do not like how it is written, tag it WP:BEFORE nominating for deletion. Bearian (talk) 17:57, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It's all over again. Uncle G (talk) 18:38, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, this is Articles for Deletion, not Articles for Clean-up. Tag it before you nominate it.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 12:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.