Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erkan Umut


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedily deleted per WP:CSD by Enochlau.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 20:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Erkan Umut

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not an A7 speedy because the subject has helpfully bolded the supposed claim to notability. Sorry, did I say subject? I meant author. Or are they in facte separate? Maybe not, looking at it. Unsourced, WP:COI, promotional in tone. Guy (Help!) 15:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * delete fails WP:BIO Creative professional by wide margin. Pete.Hurd 16:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * weak delete I'm not sure it fails WP:BIO as this could be an instance of eurocentricism.  However, the article as it stands is unsourced, and that is the principle thing that I personally judge articles on the chopping block by.  No claim in this article is attributed.  i kan reed 22:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions.   -- Eastmain 23:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletions.   -- Eastmain 23:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unless, of course, reliable sources are added to the article in the next few days.  bikeable (talk) 03:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable autobiography. Jehochman (talk/contrib) 19:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.