Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Aaron Rowe (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Ernest Aaron Rowe
Non-notable writer whose only claim to fame was a blog he plagiarized for. It appears that he evaded the previous VfD by using meat puppets, and no significant improvement to the article has been made since then. The only references are a Google search, the offline blog for which he plagiarized, and a forum post. 141.117.57.26 15:56, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Rklawton 16:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. NawlinWiki 17:05, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I moved this to its own new page, but the old debate is at Articles for deletion/Ernest Aaron Rowe.  Mango juice talk 17:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. So he's a reverend with the Universal Life Church? Who the hell isn't? HumbleGod 18:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. —Quarl (talk) 2006-07-05 00:23Z 
 * Delete per nom. Not even close to fullfilling WP:WEB or WP:BIO. Dunno how it slipped past the last AfD, but let's drive a stake into its heart, to be sure. --Calton | Talk 01:22, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. How in the world has this survived so long? Such non-notable vanity. Grand  master  ka  06:31, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I get the impression that Rowe has done more than the entry lets on (his play Bunker is supposedly being produced as a motion picture, for example, and his work has apparently been published in national magazines). However, I don't know if that really meets the criteria for notability, and so I don't have an opinion either way if this should be deleted. Sad to see it go, though. Frankg 15:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per norm.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.