Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Johnson (American football)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 09:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Ernest Johnson (American football)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks presumed notability and fails the google test. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 04:39, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  04:40, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  04:40, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  04:40, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @  04:40, 17 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep "Google" isn't the measure of notability, especially for college football coaches active in the 1950s and 1960s. Head coaches of college football programs are almost always considered notable and I see no reason to make an exception here.  Logic at WP:CFBCOACH applies.  Certainly could use some "beefing up" but that's editing, not deletion.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of coverage of subject at Newspapers.com. Jweiss11 (talk) 23:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Could this article use an overhaul of good info? Yes. Should we delete it? Absolutely not. He is notable in being a college coach (Even if the article has not much info) and keeping with what Jweiss11 said, there is coverage on the internet of him. (Feels like this could end in a landslide keep.) James-the-Charizard (talk) 00:04, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jweiss11. WP:TROUT to the nominator for a total lack of WP:BEFORE, and for thinking that "the google test" was in any way sufficient for a subject that was born in 1921, died in 1985, and last active in their field in 1962. Ejgreen77 (talk) 14:00, 23 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.