Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Wong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Espresso Addict (talk) 12:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Ernest Wong

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Completing unfinished nomination by. No opinion yet. The article has been tagged for notability since May 2007. The ~200 Chinese GHits are about unrelated individuals ; had time to go through the English GNews hits, but at a cursory glance I haven't found any which are actually about the same Ernest Wong. . cab (talk) 03:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:N and WP:BIO for academics. --Sc straker (talk) 03:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above comments. Just no notability Corpx (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —David Eppstein (talk) 22:07, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete NLP trainers are not academics. i doubt he is a notable trained in " ACCELERATRED LEARNING" either. (spelling as in the article) DGG (talk) 09:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. I agree he's not an academic, but I listed it in the deletion sorting page because there is a claim in the article that he's an educator: the part about founding a language learning center (with a name strangely resembling but not the same as UNESCO) and teaching 20k people to speak (don't most people older than a toddler already know how to do this?). As for the article itself, I'm concerned that it's taking the names of the Universities of California and British Columbia in vain: I searched but couldn't find any official connection between anything named "Turning Point" and UC, nor between the Society of NLP and UBC. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.