Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest the Pirate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No consensus. This is the very model of a modern no consensus AfD. Whether this article is kept or merged is a debate that can be held outside of AfD. Deathphoenix ʕ 21:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Ernest the Pirate
fairly nn, unfinished/unreleased film. Fails the proposed WP:NOTFILM and gets 48 unique google hits. I like Ernest films as much as the next guy, but this wasn't even finished or released, and would be best left a trivia point on Ernest's main page. Giant onehead 23:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete may be notable if sources can be found. As it is, it is probably better to delete, leaving the mention at Ernest P. Worrell.  Eluchil404 02:39, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I think a lost Ernest movie is notable enough to have an article, though the fact that there's so little information about it makes it harder to justify.Zincomog 03:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 13:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment, needs WP:V sourcing... but if this is done it could be kept.--Isotope23 15:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep, Source and Merge It is never going to be a big article so better to keep but to merge into a bigger article.—Argentino (talk/cont.) 19:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge, per Argentino.Ramsquire 23:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks notability. Nonexistence of the subject is an argument against keeping around an encyclopedia article. Certainly the present article doesn't say much and has no verifiable sources. EdJohnston 14:01, 8 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.