Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernestine Fu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Ernestine Fu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Rather nonnotable "investor" and "author" Staszek Lem (talk) 22:30, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:36, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:36, 5 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Not sure why the nominator has investor and author in quotes since Fu is actually a Silicon Valley investor and entrepreneur and she did co-author a book that was reviewed in Change. She has also been subject of RS over time and therefore passes GNG. I would like to note that on the talk page,, who is interested in technology, noticed her name on the requested page list here on Wikipedia and decided to create the article for that reason. I'm saying this so there is no charge of this article being written for "promotional" purposes. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:29, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete blatantly promotional in nature; the lack of conflicts-of-interest does not change that fact. Power~enwiki (talk) 22:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:00, 12 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep. Article needs work. While I abhor the hiring of young woman (in this case as a college sophomore into a VC - ) into male dominated industries in an effort to achieve publicity - unfortunately this approach does generate publicity. There are enough sources on her in a BEFORE.Icewhiz (talk) 08:32, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: Adequate indicia of notability,  Also, given the unrelenting sexism faced by women in tech, it's clear she's managed to hang in there better than most and has significant accomplishments.   Montanabw (talk) 05:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I generally don't believe "30 under 30" style articles give notability, and those (or press releases) appear to be almost all the references. Power~enwiki (talk) 05:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: Has a number of articles with her name in the title specifically about her, as well as mentioned in about 10 articles all up, so seems notable. Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.