Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernesto Piedras


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Ernesto Piedras

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't seem to satisfy any of the conditions in WP:PROF. GS h-index is 1 is 3, so WP:PROF#1 is out of consideration. CronopioFlotante (talk) 09:03, 16 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:21, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Query "Ernesto Piedras" gets 435 regular Google hits, 499 Google News hits, 52 Google Books hits, and 66 Google Scholar hits. What is your explanation of that?  Abductive  (reasoning) 09:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I was missing some entries. GS h-index is actually 3. --CronopioFlotante (talk) 10:38, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Regarding the Google hits, my claim is that Ernesto Piedras is not notable according to WP:PROF. He writes in newspapers. That would explain his presence in Google. --CronopioFlotante (talk) 10:45, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note User who created the article has been blocked User_talk:The-ciu. Ernesto Piedras may not get a fair defense. --CronopioFlotante (talk) 13:28, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —John Z (talk) 09:58, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions.  —Qwfp (talk) 10:48, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:AUTHOR standards enough to satisfy me. I'm not Mexican but I'm willing to bet any editors from Mexico would defend his notability emphatically. Impressive Google test too. Shouldn't be too hard to cleanup and reference. -- &oelig; &trade; 21:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * After checking out some of the Google hits I noticed that several of them are related to his job as general director of The Competitive Inteligence Unit, S.C, a consulting firm specializing on telecoms. I'm not sure that they point towards WP:AUTHOR being satisfied. I agree that input by Mexican editors would settle this matter. --CronopioFlotante (talk) 15:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep I'm not Mexican, but there are enough sources to satisfy me. Cerebellum (talk) 19:30, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you mean per WP:AUTHOR? --CronopioFlotante (talk) 19:47, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.