Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernesto Vazquez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 02:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Ernesto Vazquez

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A foootballer who has never played a competitive match - Fails WP:ATHLETE. Livna-Maor (talk) 00:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * cmt these guys all appear to be in the squad at Club America, but haven't made an appearance yet (they're young). I'm not sure how athlete is to be interpreted -- these guys are full professionals for big clubs, but not sure if that counts as having "competed" at the highest level. Hopefully someone with more expertise in these areas will happen along. I know there are a lot of football focused editors.Bali ultimate (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:08, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Punkmorten (talk) 11:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Vázquez Muñoz played for Socio Águila in the Mexican Primera A (2nd level) during the 2007-08 season (see here). Does anyone know if that level is fully-pro? Jogurney (talk) 14:06, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The link wouldn't open for me. But, I think they play in the league just below the premier division, so it would probably make him notable. Livna-Maor (talk) 14:08, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, their site is Java-heavy; try one of the links here. Jogurney (talk) 14:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * According to Federación Mexicana de Fútbol Asociación, the top four divisions are fully professional. I don't know whether this is correct or not though. I'd want to see some confirmation of this before making a decision. Bettia   (rawr!)  14:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Placeholder comment, pending resolution of above issue. --Dweller (talk) 14:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I've recommended in a similar AfD a question be posted at WT:FOOTY --Dweller (talk) 14:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Awaiting resolution of consensus on Primera_División_A beign fully professional. If it is, Reluctant Keep per WP:ATHLETE, else Delete as fails notability criteria per WP:ATHLETE -- Club Oranje Talk 10:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. After a bit of hunting around, it appears Primera Division A is fully professional. On that basis and what Jogurney has found, I'm !voting keep as he would satisfy WP:ATHLETE. Bettia   (rawr!)  14:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.