Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernst Ludwig von Aster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Electriccatfish2 (talk) 23:39, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Ernst Ludwig von Aster

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Only one source; notability questionable. However, I don't think the problem was strong enough to garner a SD Cssiitcic (talk) 19:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:54, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:54, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:54, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:54, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep- The German article shows sufficient sources, including a link to the two-page bio in the national encyclopedia currently cited in the article as the sole reference for this general, and others are available online citing recognition of naming Fort Asterstein after him. Dru of Id (talk) 04:16, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, blindingly obviously. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep- ADB entry Agathoclea (talk) 21:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Per military nobility guidelines, WP:MILPEOPLE: "Held a rank considered to be a flag, general or air officer, or their historical equivalents" Bgwhite (talk) 22:48, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.