Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erogrendel (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 02:08, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Erogrendel (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A self-published book that was released four days ago. Fails WP:NBOOK. Bgwhite (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * It looks like the article creator has been trying to create pages for this author's book since 2012. Long term promotional account, it seems. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. This just isn't a notable work. There's nothing out there to show that this book is notable enough for an entry at all. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:41, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as not notable; no reliable sources have been added, as none exist. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:INHERIT - Father's fame does not make him notable. WP:INDISCRIMINATE - Summary-only description of a piece of media. Jergling (talk) 17:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.