Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eroica Classical Recordings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Eroica Classical Recordings

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable record label, zero sourcing found. Prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies,  and California. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  02:40, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Some amusing whoppers in this article. The claim about their Bartók CD is contradicted by a Hungaroton disc with Barnabás Kelemen and Zoltán Kocsis that has the exact same program. (It's looking at me from the shelves next to my desk!) If I remember correctly, Isabelle Faust and André Gertler also recorded the same program prior to the one made by the above label. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete as per nom. This ought to be beyond uncontroversial: there are zero independent sources. At this stage, this is not remotely well-attested enough to come near WP:NCORP.Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 23:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete It is a company therefore NCORP applies, none of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 10:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.