Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eromo Egbejule


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:21, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Eromo Egbejule

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable individual lacking Ghits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:BIO.  ttonyb (talk) 21:15, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 9 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Google hits is not the sole indicator of notability, and entrepreneurship and boldness should not be held against him. It's tough to get started as a writer or community organizer in Nigeria, so that should be considered. What might be trivial to accomplish in a western city is more notable in Nigeria. He seems to be a credible writer. It is helpful when wikipedia has biographies of people like this. Article could use editing, though. Wxidea (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment – Nothing you have said indicates a reason to keep.  How has this article established notability via Wikipedia guidelines? If hie is such a renown entrepreneur there should be sufficient support for this article; however, that does not appear to be the case.  ttonyb  (talk) 17:05, 14 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete nothing in gnews, fails WP:BIO. Looks like a promotional resume. LibStar (talk) 17:42, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Unlike the 'Gunvald Strøm-Walseng' AfD, where I disagree with LibStar, and think he's erring too far on the side of rejecting a possibly notable 60-years-dead barrister; here we have a young Nigerian, in the Internet age, without much written. If this sniffs too much of a 'promotional resume' to LibStar and ttonyb (I have a more charitable read), then I feel comfortable changing my vote to Neutral. No harm will come if it takes a few years before Eromo is notable enough by Wikipedia criteria to set up a page for himself or some notable venture he starts. Wxidea (talk) 19:34, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.