Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EroomX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was: Speedily deleted - no claim of notability, borderline spam. - Mike Rosoft 21:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

EroomX

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable company, verges on spam. Rackabello 12:42, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Definite adspam. 67.81.139.52 12:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * .whoops. thats me. Mystache 12:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Verges on spam, then falls right in... Robertissimo 12:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions.   -- --Rrburke(talk) 14:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per violation of adverising/spam guidelines.  Zchris87v  14:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ads of a non-notable company. Keb25 14:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Changing my inital nomination to Speedy Delete under criterion G11 Rackabello 18:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete G11. Sneaks up on spam then backstabs it... --Chuck Sirloin 20:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete under G11 or A7. Carlosguitar 20:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.