Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eros-Film


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  21:49, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Eros-Film

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unremarkable Russian film studio. Declined prod(!). Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:13, 8 June 2008 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Wknight94 (talk) 18:22, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. It may be unremarkable for America with its monstrous porn industry, but searching google for russian terms for Эрос-Фильм and Армен Оганезов shows a reasonable number of hits besides film ads. Unfortunately the only things I can contribute from Russian sources is cut and paste cyrillic spellings of names. And by the way, I also noticed that the list of films produced is quite long. If you wish, I can cut and paste this list (untranslated) into the article as well, countering systemic bias in wikipedia :-) Mukadderat (talk) 15:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete film-house with some 40-odd film catalogue specialised in girls who lie back and think of Russia may sound notable, but isn't. Article is feeble on independent sources. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * . What can I say? Only that Russian wikipedians are not so obsessed with national sex industry, unlike, say, american porn proliferating in wikipedia. Just the same I doubt that girls that lie back and thing of America are of higher notability, but abound in wikipedia. Like I said, there are refs in Russian language, but I cannot add them because I cannot read. Mukadderat (talk) 19:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  18:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. This film company fails WP:CORP. The author's point about systemic bias is well taken, but the author has not offered WP:RELIABLE 3rd-party sources in any language. Even with systemic bias, WP:PROVEIT applies. • Gene93k (talk) 20:41, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I checked, and it fails WP:CORP, as Gene93k said. It has not been covered by secondary sources, and the only external links are the company's website, their film catalogue, and a brief entry at iMDB. Shapiros10  contact me My work  21:54, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORP and WP:N at present. Artene50 (talk) 01:33, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.