Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erosentuous


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. A1 lack of context, A3 lack of content without chance of expansion. Mgm|(talk) 13:43, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Erosentuous

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

neologism, unencyclopedic, etc. &eta;oian   &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  02:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No such word; not even erosensuous, the spelling they were probably aiming for, appears to be credible. JNW (talk) 02:37, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * On the other hand, there's a couple of hits for erosensual. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:34, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. FreplySpang 02:53, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. This material belongs on Urban Dictionary. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 03:46, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Not even, I should have stated protologism. (not a word) &eta;oian   &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  03:54, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I checked google, and my two unabridged dictionaries, and could not find the word in question; therefore, recommend deletion of article "...for which all attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed," as per Deletion_policy. kilbad (talk) 04:10, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, do not pass Wiktionary, do not collect 200 Wikimoney. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.