Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erotic music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  An as  talk? 17:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Erotic music

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

As written, this is impossibly broad and subjective—the article describes something defined by "rhythmical cadences, melodies or suggestive lyrics", independent of style, and thus it could comprise any number of otherwise unrelated things, just by virtue of the "sensations" they induce. This may also have been a companion piece to the other article by creating user, which, as evidenced by talk page, was speedily deleted as spam. Unint 17:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced original research. It may be possible to write an article about this subject, but it's probably easier to start from scratch than modify this one. --Huon 17:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong delete. A textbook case of original research that a reliable encyclopedia cannot afford to have.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 17:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ATT etc. Totally subjective. EyeSereneTALK 18:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly original research Emmaneul (Talk) 19:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Personal essay. Greg Grahame 21:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless reliable sources can be provided to support this kind of music, it should be deleted. Spellcast 21:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 23:20, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 16:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.