Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eryl Maunder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Speedily deleted twice per WP:CSD. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:25, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Eryl Maunder

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

University lecturer who has had some papers published. However, having papers published is not especially notable; WP:PROF#8 affirms notability only to a subject who "is or has been an editor-in-chief of a major well-established journal in their subject area". There is no indication that any of the criteria at WP:PROF have been met. I42 (talk) 20:13, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't meet criteria for WP:PROF. --Whoosit (talk) 21:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)


 * "If an academic/professor meets any one of WP:PROF, as substantiated through reliable sources, they are notable." Also, if the academic meets criteria for WP:Notability, they may still be notable. --The Fourth Dimension (talk) 08:36, 27 July 2010 (UTC) — The Fourth Dimension (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Correct. The nomination states that none of the criteria appear to have been met. I42 (talk) 19:14, 27 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, almost no citability of papers, currently a PhD student. Fails WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 05:07, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, not even close to notable, merely a "Lecturer", doesn't even have her PhD yet. Created by an SPA. --MelanieN (talk) 14:12, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.