Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esbjerg Printing Museum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) LibStar (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Esbjerg Printing Museum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:ORG. 3 out of 5 listed sources are its own website. I could not find significant coverage for its Danish name. LibStar (talk) 07:59, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Small museum, but it does get some coverage.  I added a Danish news story as a source.  It is in the English language guidebooks, and gets mentioned in travel articles, ("Nordic delights," Daily Telegraph, ) Note: that the city has named the street the Museum is on after the Museum, address is "19 Bogtrykmuseet." There is no reason to delete a small museum about printing, that has existed for decades and is sourced.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:14, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * a one line mention in a newspaper article is hardly indepth coverage. LibStar (talk) 10:20, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * neither are 1 or 2 line mentions in travel guide books. LibStar (talk) 10:21, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * "En kendsgerning er det, at bogtrykmuseet i Viborg på utrolig kort tid har samlet utrolig mange genstande fra dengang, der var typografer til. Ikke bare fylder sagerne de 300 kvadratmeter i selve museet på Gl. Århusvej 21 b, men også 400 kvadratmeter på lagre." adding this Stifts Folkeblad story to article now.  long-established museums can almost always be soruced.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:23, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:23, 8 May 2017 (UTC)


 * gBook search in Danish .E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.