Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escalon Medical


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 21:38, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Escalon Medical

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficient evidence that this company meets WP:Notability guidelines. A previous version was deleted as an expired PROD so I'm using AFD. Note: This is a student project - if this company IS notable, we can help the editor find reliable sources that demonstrate the company's notability. If it is NOT notable, USERFYing rather than DELETING may allow the editor to complete his class requirement. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  20:57, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - The subject fails WP:ORG. The sources included in the article do not meet the depth of coverage required for corporation notability. They are either routine coverage or press releases. I did find this through a cursory Google search, but I'm not sure if it would be considered reliable. Respectfully, Mz7 (talk) 21:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * How does it fail WP:ORG? company is WP:LISTED; discussed (The Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Reuters) -- Cy be r XR ef ☎ 01:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Excluding the press release, the links you mention to not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  03:15, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. I was going to relist this, but I ran into the problem described at User talk:Mr.Z-man and 61953. Please no-one relist/close this just yet so that the bug can be investigated. Thanks — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 09:41, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, yes they're listed on the stock exchange, but I see only routine coverage. Does not meet WP:CORP yet.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:26, 10 March 2014 (UTC).
 * Delete They are listed only on Nasdaq, which does not confer or even imply notability ; it is different from NYSE listing, which often does imply it, though we do not accept it as absolute proof. I have already given advice to the student project that the safest way to avoid fruitless work  is to stick to NYSE companies. (in general student projects should make sure to select topics that are quite certain to be notable, and if the ambassador or instructor are not experienced enough to tell, they should ask in advance. This is really our problem, in not providing sufficient support, but it's hard to deal with projects that don't know they need the support.)    DGG ( talk ) 17:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.