Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escape Reality


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy deleted under CSD A1 (insufficient context to identify the subject of the article). It will be time to have an article on this subject if and when (a) it exists and (b) it has established notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:01, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Escape Reality

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD. No indication of notability, no sources, and fails WP:CRYSTAL. bonadea contributions talk 16:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It should not be deleted, because I have now officially started work on it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooldude816 (talk • contribs)
 * Above comment moved from talk page (Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Escape Reality). Guoguo12  --Talk--  16:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - no context - what is it? Also WP:CRYSTAL and lavk of notability. &mdash; RHaworth 23:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete The nominator sums this up nicely. The product isn't expected to exist for another 2-3 years and is from a non-notable company. Edward321 (talk) 03:55, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:25, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  MrKIA11 (talk) 10:34, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Let it escape from Wikipedia, since it is not a reality yet (whatever it is).•••Life of Riley (T–C) 14:55, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.