Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escocia tropical (Drink)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. clear consensus  DGG ( talk ) 17:55, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Escocia tropical (Drink)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't find any evidence of notability. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 12:35, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Same as above-- 115ash →(☏) 15:46, 27 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete ...same reason as my original PROD, not notable. Should have been A11'd in retrospect. § FreeRangeFrog croak 15:53, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Invented by article's creator or someone they know. Blackguard  16:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Not even close to being notable. Pichpich (talk) 18:18, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 21:45, 27 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete – Per source searches, does not meet WP:N. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 13:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Probably could be speedy deleted as an A11. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:13, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.