Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escude

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratsche talk 5 pillars July 1, 2005 20:33 (UTC)

Escude
No content, just obscure vanity. I tried to speedy delete this, calling it vanity. It was rejected as not speediable, but I can't imagine that this wouldn't fall into that category. What could I label it to pass muster as a speedy?Atomiktoaster 01:31, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanity. It's also a very short article with little or no context if you ask me. &mdash; &#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#x263a; 01:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity, nn. Falphin 01:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The game's not even notable! humblefool&reg; 02:20, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * There is no existing speedy deletion criterion that covers this. Vanity is not a speedy deletion criterion.  The proposal to make "blatant vanity" a speedy deletion criterion was rejected.  Please do not abuse the speedy deletion criteria. Uncle G 03:17, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Ecclesiastes 1:2. &mdash; mark &#9998; 08:19, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable vanity. JamesBurns 10:07, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nnanity, and pity the 'pedia for turning away the opportunity at speedying these things. -Splash 16:08, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. CanadianCaesar 20:00, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity. Wikiacc (talk) 21:14, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I think it could be argued that this could be covered under WP:CSD section 1.2.1. --Xcali 22:09, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity with no content. --Etacar11 22:46, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.