Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ese Te Ese


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Keep and rename to Satanas (gang) per WP:COMMONNAME (non-admin closure) '''-- [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Riley_Huntley/You_missed! Cheers, ] Ri l ey   ''' 00:03, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Ese Te Ese

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable club lacking references of substance. Only one of the references refers to the gang, but there is nothing to tie the title of the article to the subject of the article. Perhaps a name change and more references are needed. red dog six (talk) 18:32, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Keep but rename to Satanas (gang) per WP:COMMONNAME. Sufficient sources exist, e.g., (subscription needed), plus the sources present in the article (especially ). Significant coverage in multiple reliable sources exists, and that's from a very cursory search on my part. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  14:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Comment i will be biased with this since i created the article. Yes i agree to rename it to Satanas (gang). Ese Te Ese aka satanas gang is very significant in LA. I could help to further expand the article. Keep --Wakowako (talk) 16:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep but rename. I found plenty of references to Satanas but only a few, Spanish-language references to Ese Te Ese. The article could use some editing and better sources, but that is not a reason to delete. --MelanieN (talk) 15:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename, sources given pass WP:GNG/etc. — Theo polisme  22:13, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.