Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eshbel Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Eshbel Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Promotion for non-notable company, article by SPA. I have been unable to find significant third-party coverage. Haakon (talk) 09:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination: corporation specializing in the development, marketing and implementation of ERP software solutions for small to mid-sized companies in the manufacturing, commercial financial and services industries.... a goal to develop the most advanced scheduler ... The development of Priority 13 WPF was part of a strategic decision to reverse the trend of constantly increasing IT costs, and address the growing need for secure “anytime, anywhere” access to the organization’s ERP application.... ERP??? - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, no sources currently in article to assert notability. I can't find any reliable sources to add to assert notability.   GB fan  talk 00:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable. Szzuk (talk) 20:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.