Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eskeri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 02:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Eskeri

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is a stub and has no references and does not describe the topic clearly. Gamemaster eleven (talk)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: AfD was improperly formatted and never listed. Fixed now.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Finngall  talk  05:44, 1 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 1 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. The article was created in 2007 with an external link from Encyclopedia Mythica which, however, was blacklisted as a source for Wikipedia in 2010, at which point the link was removed. I can find just one earlier source, the Encyclopedia of Russian and Slavic Myth and Legend, published in 1998. The information given there is one sentence, just different enough to argue that this article is acceptable paraphrase rather than copyright violation. PWilkinson (talk) 18:30, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   14:37, 8 July 2014 (UTC)




 * Keep as per . I too searched, only reference I found was Wilkinson's. I realize there needs to be several independent sources, but in this case, given the article is only two lines long, contains essentially one fact based on one reliable source, with no copyright issues as Wilkinson said, and does not seem amenable to POV or spam issues, and could be a useful tidbit of information for people studying creation myths, or the Turgus peoples of eastern Siberia, I say let's keep it.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:30, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.