Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esmond James


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. It's snowing. Unanimous comment from all involved that the subject fails the general notability guideline and the notability guideline for footballers. WilliamH (talk) 18:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Esmond James

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The information on playing professionally for Watford is false, and I see nothing else to suggest that he meets the GNG. —WFC— 01:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Proof that he has not played for Watford, to save others time . —WFC— 01:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Mattythewhite (talk) 02:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as he fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL, having never played for a club in a fully professional league, -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, footballer fails WP:NFOOTY as he has not played at a fully-professional level of football. Also fails WP:GNG due to a lack of any significant media coverage. --Jimbo[online] 12:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Life  talk  16:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. --Reckless182 (talk) 12:34, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.