Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esmond Pitt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:27, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Esmond Pitt

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence of adequate notability. Louiedog (talk) 15:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 4 April 2012 (UTC)


 * delete full of unreferenced claims. Fails WP:BIO LibStar (talk) 10:43, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * delete Vanity page, no notability as we understand the term. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:51, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, my usual rule of thumb is that if a bio describes its subject as an "entrepreneur", then it's probably a vanity page of a non-notable businessperson. This does not appear to be an exception to that rule.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 21:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC).
 * I would add that people described as entrepreneurs nearly always turn out to be the very opposite of entrepreneurs, i.e. to have worked for large, well-established organisations rather than establish businesses themselves. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:49, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking in-depth coverage by independent third party sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.