Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric Order of Dagon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Innsmouth. Tone 07:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Esoteric Order of Dagon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fictional entity that fails WP:NFICTION/WP:PLOT/GNG. BEFORE reveals only plot summaries. There is also a disambig like entry for several real world organizations whose name was inspired by this but none seem to pass WP:NORG. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with edit summary significant feature of Lovecraft's work; take to AfD" so here we are. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:36, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  02:36, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  02:36, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  02:36, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:59, 14 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge to Innsmouth, where the EOD is located. The scection in that article is rather short and could use expanding.-- Auric   talk  22:26, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Shadow Over Innsmouth or merge with Innsmouth This fictional organisation is only relevant to one of Lovecraft's stories. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 22:33, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge per Auric. Toddst1 (talk) 22:34, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * merge makes sense. Artw (talk) 02:47, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.