Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esperança (non-profit)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rainbow unicorn (talk) 06:18, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Esperança (non-profit)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I accepted this from AfC in order to get a community judgment on whether it's notable. Personally, I doubt it--this 11-person group would obviously like to become notable, but its activities are very minor. I think the press amounts to PR, but others may judge differently.  DGG ( talk ) 18:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 19:27, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 19:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: The article has sources that contain significant coverage, not just PR, and coverage spans multiple decades. Vrac (talk) 03:19, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Tentative keep - I saw this one earlier but wanted to wait until someone else commented and I think this has good enough coverage to be notable. I haven't searched for additional sources yet but this seems acceptable. SwisterTwister   talk  03:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to note that I added a couple of additional sources from USAID and the Child Survival Collaborations and Resources Group.Rtapscott (talk) 17:43, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep -It is clear that this meets the notably requirements of Wikipedia. The sources, as noted above, come from a number of publications and span multiple decades. The additional documents that were added last week strengthen the article. Rtapscott (talk) 22:26, 20 August 2015 (UTC) User talk:Rtapscott is the creator of this article. Disclosure added per WP:AFDFORMAT.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮  JAaron95  Talk  14:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  14:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I could not find any significant coverage of the organization online. It does not appear to meet WP:ORG criteria.--Rpclod (talk) 18:14, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Regardless of the organization's size, there are reliable sources that cover it in depth. One is from the L.A. Times and the another I found was from the Non-profit Journal. I stopped my search there. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:10, 28 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.