Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esportz Entertainment Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Esportz Entertainment Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence this is a notable company despite the dozens of gnews hits which are all passing mentions or press releases. Praxidicae (talk) 13:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment None of the sources listed are passing mentions, in fact they all focus on the subject to the extent that Esportz Entertainment Corp. (or some variation) is in the title. Besides this, I think characterizing sources like Reuters, European Gaming, and Celebrity Access as press releases is inaccurate, although they are industry publications. The page was nominated for speedy deletion as spam just yesterday by the same editor nominating it here, but that nomination was overturned by an admin. I feel like this nomination as non-notable is just a continuation of that debate, since this editor does not approve of the outcome. I understand the importance of preventing spam but this page does meet Wikipedia's criteria. ElectricNatchos (talk) 20:50, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Not a single article is in depth coverage, they're all press releases, passing mentions or WP:MILL. Praxidicae (talk) 21:47, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:28, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:28, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:29, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:29, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Being the largest esport network isn't notable? That's a joke right? Seems plenty notable as it is, and I assume there will only be more stuff published about it in the coming years. I don't really know how anyone could think that this is WP:MILL. Bluedude588 (talk) 16:01, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * what independent source states this and isn’t based on a press release? Praxidicae (talk) 16:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , can you please provide a reference that isn't based on information provided by the company? The claims of being the "largest esport network" appears to be one that is made by the company itself.  HighKing++ 15:43, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I withdraw my comment. Didn't realize that press releases weren't allowed. Bluedude588 (talk) 22:08, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, it is more conventional to strike it out by surrounding the text with some markup as follows: " The Original Text You Wish To Strike Out " which would result in it looking like this: The Original Text You Wish To Strike Out .  HighKing++ 13:10, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:13, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content. Independenr Content must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject - none of the sources meets this test. Topic fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 15:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.